Clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with two consecutive anti-TNF agents: data from the ENEIDA registry.

Background: Infliximab seems to be the most efficacious of the three available anti-TNF agents for ulcerative colitis (UC) but little is known when it is used as the second anti-TNF. Objectives: To compare the clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC patients. Design: Retrospective observational study. Methods: Patients from the ENEIDA registry treated consecutively with infliximab and a subcutaneous anti-TNF (or vice versa), naïve to other biological agents, were identified and grouped according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF into IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). Results: Overall, 473 UC patients were included (330 IVi and 143 SCi). Clinical response at week 14 was 42.7% and 48.3% in the IVi and SCi groups (non-statistically significant), respectively. Clinical remission rates at week 52 were 32.8% and 31.4% in the IVi and SCi groups (nonsignificant differences), respectively. A propensity-matched score analysis showed a higher clinical response rate at week 14 in the SCi group and higher treatment persistence in the IVi group. Regarding long-term outcomes, dose escalation and discontinuation due to the primary failure of the first anti-TNF and more severe disease activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were inversely associated with clinical remission. Conclusion: The use of a second anti-TNF for UC seems to be reasonable in terms of efficacy, although it is particularly reduced in the case of the primary failure of the first anti-TNF. Whether the second anti-TNF is infliximab or subcutaneous does not seem to affect efficacy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC patients. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: Patients from the ENEIDA registry treated consecutively with infliximab and a subcutaneous anti-TNF (or vice versa), naïve to other biological agents, were identified and grouped according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF into IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). RESULTS: Overall, 473 UC patients were included (330 IVi, 143 SCi). Clinical response at week 14 was 42.7% and 48.3% in the IVi and SCi groups (non-statistically significant), respectively. Clinical remission rates at week 52 were 32.8% and 31.4%, in the IVi and SCi groups (nonsignificant differences), respectively. A propensity-matched score analysis showed a higher clinical response rate at week 14 in the SCi group and higher treatment persistence in the IVi group. Regarding long-term outcomes, dose escalation and discontinuation due to the primary failure of the first anti-TNF and more severe disease activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were inversely associated with clinical remission. CONCLUSION: The use of a second anti-TNF for UC seems to be reasonable in terms of efficacy, although it is particularly reduced in the case of the primary failure of the first anti-TNF. Whether the second anti-TNF is infliximab or subcutaneous does not seem to affect efficacy.

Clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with two consecutive anti-TNF agents. Data from the ENEIDA registry Background: Infliximab seems to be the most efficacious of the three available anti-TNF agents for ulcerative colitis (UC), but little is known when it is used as the second anti-TNF.

Hematological Composite Scores in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and the systemic immune-inflammatory index (SIRI, neutrophils × monocytes/lymphocytes) have been identified as potential inflammatory biomarkers. In this work we aimed to analyze whether the hematological composite scores differ between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients and healthy controls, and if they are related to disease activity. A total of 197 IBD patients-130 Crohn's (CD) disease and 67 ulcerative colitis (UC)-and 208 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were enrolled. C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin were assessed. Multivariable linear regression analysis was executed. After adjustment, NLR and PLR, but not SIRI and MLR, were significantly higher in IBD patients compared to controls. C-reactive protein and SIRI and NLR were correlated in IBD patients. However, fecal calprotectin was not related to any of these blood scores. Furthermore, disease activity parameters were not associated with any of the blood composite scores in both CD and UC patients. In conclusion, NLR and PLR, but not SIRI and MLR, are independently higher in IBD patients compared to controls. However, the four hematological scores are not related to disease activity in either CD or UC patients. Based on these results, blood-based inflammatory scores may not serve as subrogated biomarkers of disease activity in IBD.

Screening uptake of colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in first-degree relatives of patients with non-syndromic colorectal cancer: A multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized trial (ParCoFit study).

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy screening is underused by first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with non-syndromic colorectal cancer (CRC) with screening completion rates below 50%. Studies conducted in FDR referred for screening suggest that fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) was not inferior to colonoscopy in terms of diagnostic yield and tumor staging, but screening uptake of FIT has not yet been tested in this population. In this study, we investigated whether the uptake of FIT screening is superior to the uptake of colonoscopy screening in the familial-risk population, with an equivalent effect on CRC detection. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This open-label, parallel-group, randomized trial was conducted in 12 Spanish centers between February 2016 and December 2021. Eligible individuals included asymptomatic FDR of index cases <60 years, siblings or ≥2 FDR with CRC. The primary outcome was to compare screening uptake between colonoscopy and FIT. The secondary outcome was to determine the efficacy of each strategy to detect advanced colorectal neoplasia (adenoma or serrated polyps ≥10 mm, polyps with tubulovillous architecture, high-grade dysplasia, and/or CRC). Screening-naïve FDR were randomized (1:1) to one-time colonoscopy versus annual FIT during 3 consecutive years followed by a work-up colonoscopy in the case of a positive test. Randomization was performed before signing the informed consent using computer-generated allocation algorithm based on stratified block randomization. Multivariable regression analysis was performed by intention-to-screen. On December 31, 2019, when 81% of the estimated sample size was reached, the trial was terminated prematurely after an interim analysis for futility. Study outcomes were further analyzed through 2-year follow-up. The main limitation of this study was the impossibility of collecting information on eligible individuals who declined to participate. A total of 1,790 FDR of 460 index cases were evaluated for inclusion, of whom 870 were assigned to undergo one-time colonoscopy (n = 431) or FIT (n = 439). Of them, 383 (44.0%) attended the appointment and signed the informed consent: 147/431 (34.1%) FDR received colonoscopy-based screening and 158/439 (35.9%) underwent FIT-based screening (odds ratio [OR] 1.08; 95% confidence intervals [CI] [0.82, 1.44], p = 0.564). The detection rate of advanced colorectal neoplasia was significantly higher in the colonoscopy group than in the FIT group (OR 3.64, 95% CI [1.55, 8.53], p = 0.003). Study outcomes did not change throughout follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, compared to colonoscopy, FIT screening did not improve screening uptake by individuals at high risk of CRC, resulting in less detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia. Further studies are needed to assess how screening uptake could be improved in this high-risk group, including by inclusion in population-based screening programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02567045).

COVID-19 vaccination rate and willingness of an additional dose among inflammatory bowel disease patients receiving biologic therapy: Fearless and with desire / Tasa de vacunación y aceptación de la dosis adicional de la vacuna frente al COVID-19 en los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal que reciben terapia biológica: sin miedo y con ganas

Background: Vaccination against COVID-19 prevents its severe forms and associated mortality and offers a promising action to control this pandemic. In September 2021, an additional dose of vaccine was approved in patients with immunosuppression including IBD patients on biologic agents. We evaluated the vaccination rate and additional dose willingness in this group of at risk patients. Methods: A single-center, cross-sectional study was performed among IBD patients on biologic agents and eligible for an additional dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. IBD clinical characteristics and type of vaccine and date of administration were checked in medical records. Acceptance was evaluated after telephone or face-to-face surveys in IBD patients. Results: Out of a total of 344 patients, 269 patients (46.1% male; mean age 47±16 years; Crohn's disease 73.6%) were included. Only 15 (5.6%) patients refused the COVID-19 vaccine mainly (40%) for conviction (COVID-19 pandemic denial). 33.3% would re-consider after discussing with their doctor and/or receiving information on the adverse effects of the vaccine. Previous to the additional dose, the COVID-19 vaccination was present in 94.4% of patients (n=254). Adverse effects occurred in 53.9% of the cases, mainly pain in the arm (40%). Up to 94.1% of the patients agreed to an additional dose and 79.4% had already received the additional dose at the final time of the assessment. Conclusions: IBD patients on biological agents accept the vaccine as well as an additional dose if recommended. Physicians in charge of IBD units should provide information and confidence in the use of the vaccine in these IBD patients.(AU)

Antecedentes: La vacunación frente al COVID-19 constituye una acción prometedora para controlar esta pandemia. En septiembre de 2021, se aprobó una dosis adicional de vacuna en pacientes con inmunosupresión, incluidos los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) que reciben agentes biológicos. En este estudio se evaluó la tasa de vacunación y la disposición de recibir la dosis adicional de vacuna en este grupo de pacientes de riesgo. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal unicéntrico con pacientes afectos de EII con tratamiento biológico y elegibles para una dosis adicional de la vacuna COVID-19. Se evaluó la aceptación y los efectos adversos de la vacuna mediante encuesta telefónica o presencial y se recopiló en las historias clínicas las características de la EII, el tipo de vacuna recibida y la fecha de administración. Resultados: De un total de 344 pacientes, 269 (46,1% varones; edad media 47±16 años; enfermedad de Crohn n=198) fueron incluidos. Solo 15 (5,6%) pacientes rechazaron la vacuna frente al COVID-19, el 40% por convicción (negación de la pandemia COVID-19). Antes de la dosis adicional, la vacuna COVID-19 se había administrado en el 94,4% de los pacientes (n=254). En el 53,9% de los casos presentaron efectos adversos, principalmente dolor en el brazo (40%). Hasta el 94,1% de los pacientes refería la aceptación de una dosis adicional de la vacuna y el 79,1% ya había recibido esta dosis adicional en el momento de la evaluación final. Conclusiones: Los pacientes con EII que reciben agentes biológicos aceptan la vacuna frente al COVID-19, así como una dosis adicional si se les recomienda. Los médicos responsables de las unidades de EII deben proporcionar información y confianza en el uso de la vacuna en estos pacientes.(AU)

Asynchronous electronic consultation between primary care and specialized care proved effective for continuum of care for viraemic hepatitis C patients / La consulta electrónica asíncrona entre atención primaria y atención especializada resultó eficaz para la continuidad de la atención a los pacientes con hepatitis C virémica

Introduction: It has been proposed that primary care diagnose and treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, a care circuit between primary and specialized care based on electronic consultation (EC) can be just as efficient in the micro-elimination of HCV. It is proposed to study characteristics and predictive factors of continuity of care in a circuit between primary and specialized care. Methods: From February/2018 to December/2019, all EC between primary and specialized care were evaluated and those due to HCV were identified. Variables for regression analysis and to identify predictors of completing the care cascade were recorded. Results: From 8098 EC, 138 were performed by 89 (29%) general practitioners over 118 patients (median 50.8 years; 74.6% men) and were related to HCV (1.9%). Ninety-two patients (78%) were diagnosed>6 months ago, and 26.3% met criteria for late presentation. Overall, 105 patients required assessment by the hepatologist, 82% (n=86) presented for the appointment, of which 67.6% (n=71) were viraemic, 98.6% of known. Finally, 61.9% (n=65) started treatment. Late-presenting status was identified as an independent predictor to complete the care cascade (OR 1.93, CI 1.71–1.99, p<0.001). Conclusion: Communication pathway between Primary and Specialized Care based on EC is effective in avoiding significant losses of viraemic patients. However, the referral rate is very low, high in late-stage diagnoses, heterogeneous, and low in new diagnoses. Therefore, early detection strategies for HCV infection in primary care are urgently needed.(AU)

Introducción: Se ha propuesto que atención primaria diagnostique y trate la infección por virus de la hepatitis C (VHC). Sin embargo, un circuito asistencial entre atención primaria y especializada basado en la consulta electrónica (CE) puede ser igual de eficiente en la microeliminación del VHC. Se propone estudiar características y factores predictivos de la continuidad asistencial en un circuito entre atención primaria y especializada. Métodos: Desde febrero/2018 y diciembre/2019 se evaluaron todas las CE entre atención primaria y especializada, y se identificaron aquellas por VHC. Se registraron variables para análisis de regresión e identificar factores predictores de completar cascada de atención. Resultados: De un total de 8.098 CE, 138 realizadas por 89 (29%) médicos generales de 118 pacientes (mediana de 50,8 años; 74,6% varones) fueron por VHC (1,9%). Noventa y dos pacientes (78%) fueron diagnosticados hace más de 6 meses), y el 26,3% cumplía criterios de presentación tardía. En total, 105 pacientes requirieron valoración por el hepatólogo. El 82% (n=86) se presentaron a la cita, de los cuales el 67,6% (n=71) eran virémicos, el 98,6% de los conocidos. Finalmente, el 61,9% (n=65) inició tratamiento. El estado de presentación tardía se identificó como un factor predictivo independiente para completar la cascada de atención (OR: 1,93; IC 95%: 1,71-1,99; p<0,001). Conclusión: La comunicación entre atención primaria y especializada basada en la CE es eficaz para evitar pérdidas significativas de pacientes virémicos. Sin embargo, la tasa de derivación es muy baja, elevada en diagnósticos en fase tardía, heterogénea y escasa en nuevos diagnósticos. Por tanto, se necesitan con urgencia, estrategias de detección precoz de infección por VHC en atención primaria.(AU)

Serum Levels of Lipoprotein Lipase Are Increased in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Disruption of the lipid profile is commonly found in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is a key molecule involved in triglyceride metabolism that plays a significant role in the progression of atherosclerosis. In this study, our aim was to study whether serum LPL levels are different in IBD patients and controls and whether IBD features are related to LPL. This was a cross-sectional study that encompassed 405 individuals; 197 IBD patients with a median disease duration of 12 years and 208 age- and sex-matched controls. LPL levels and a complete lipid profile were assessed in all individuals. A multivariable analysis was performed to determine whether LPL serum levels were altered in IBD and to study their relationship with IBD characteristics. After the fully multivariable analysis, including cardiovascular risk factors and the changes in lipid profile that the disease causes itself, patients with IBD showed significantly higher levels of circulating LPL (beta coefficient 196 (95% confidence interval from 113 to 259) ng/mL, p < 0.001). LPL serum levels did not differ between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. However, serum C-reactive protein levels, disease duration, and the presence of an ileocolonic Crohn's disease phenotype were found to be significantly and independently positively related to LPL. In contrast, LPL was not associated with subclinical carotid atherosclerosis. In conclusion, serum LPL levels were independently upregulated in patients with IBD. Inflammatory markers, disease duration and disease phenotype were responsible for this upregulation.

Definition of a therapeutic range for predicting long-term infliximab response in patients with inflammatory bowel disease / Definición de un rango terapéutico para predecir la respuesta al infliximab a largo plazo en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal

Introduction: Monitoring plasma levels of Infliximab plays an important role in optimising treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of the following study has been to determine the predictive potential of monitoring infliximab plasma levels for sustained clinical response and evaluate its usefulness to improve treatment efficacy and symptom control, in patients with IBD.MethodsThis single-centre retrospective study (2017–2019) included patients diagnosed with IBD treated with infliximab. Serum levels and the occurrence of drug-associated immunogenicity were analysed at Week 8 post-induction and 6, 12 and 24 months. Clinical parameters and inflammatory markers were recorded such as subjective global assessment (SGA), C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FC). Factors associated with early discontinuation and dose intensification of infliximab were determined.ResultsMultivariate analysis determined that IFX concentrations>7μg/mL at week 8, and at 6 months, are associated with inflammatory remission (p=0.046, 0.045). IFX>7μg/mL at 12 months predicted remission at 18 months of treatment (p=0.006). IFX values>3μg/mL at 12 months are associated with stable SGA at 18 months (p=0.001). Such values at 18 months are associated with stable SGA at 24 months (p=0.044).Conclusions and relevanceThe predictive potential of monitoring IFX plasma levels as a strategy to evaluate sustained long-term clinical response was confirmed. Our results highlight the importance of its introduction into routine clinical practice to enable early identification of non-responders, treatment optimisation, relapse prevention and improve long-term therapy maintenance. (AU)

Introducción: La monitorización de infliximab (IFX) juega un papel importante en la optimización del tratamiento en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII). El objetivo del estudio fue determinar el potencial predictivo de la monitorización de IFX para la respuesta clínica sostenida, y evaluar su utilidad en la eficacia del tratamiento y del control de los síntomas.MétodosEstudio retrospectivo unicéntrico (2017-2019) que incluyó pacientes con EII tratados con IFX. Se analizaron los niveles séricos y la inmunogenicidad asociada al fármaco en la semana 8 postinducción, y a los 6, 12 y 24 meses. Se registraron los parámetros clínicos y los marcadores inflamatorios correspondientes a la evaluación global subjetiva (SGA), proteína C reactiva (PCR) y calprotectina fecal (CF). Se determinaron los factores asociados a la interrupción precoz y a la intensificación de la dosis de IFX.ResultadosEl análisis multivariante determinó que las concentraciones de IFX>7μg/ml en la semana 8, y a los 6 meses, se asocian a la remisión inflamatoria (p=0,046-0,045). El IFX>7μg/ml a los 12 meses predijo la remisión a los 18 meses de tratamiento (p=0,006). Los valores de IFX>3μg/ml a los 12 meses se asocian a una SGA estable a los 18 meses (p=0,001). Dichos valores a los 18 meses se asocian a SGA estable a los 24 meses (p=0,044).Conclusiones y relevanciaSe confirma el potencial predictivo de la monitorización de los niveles plasmáticos de IFX como estrategia para evaluar la respuesta clínica sostenida a largo plazo. Nuestros resultados destacan la importancia de su introducción en la práctica clínica habitual para permitir la identificación temprana de los no respondedores, la optimización del tratamiento, la prevención de recaídas y mejorar el mantenimiento de la terapia a largo plazo. (AU)

Efficacy, Efficiency, and Acceptability of Telemedicine for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients' Follow-Up Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, ambulatory clinic visits were replaced by the implementation of telehealth modalities in most inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) units. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, efficiency, patient satisfaction, and acceptability of using telephone consultation in an IBD unit. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in IBD patients who underwent telephone consultation during COVID-19 lockdown (between 16th March and 13th April 2020). To assess the efficacy of this telephone consultation (lockdown visit), nonscheduled visits, emergency consultation, hospital admission, and surgery from lockdown visit to the next scheduled consultation (post-lockdown) were checked. To evaluate efficiency, the time between lockdown visit and post-lockdown consultation was compared with previous consultation (pre-lockdown), and the total number of visits 12 months before and after lockdown visit was checked. A telephone survey was designed to rate perception for a telephone consultation. RESULTS: Out of a total of 274 patients, 220 patients (52.2% male; mean age 49 ± 16 years; Crohn's disease, n = 126; ulcerative colitis, n = 83; indeterminate colitis, n = 11) were included. Only one patient was consulted at the emergency department, 11 patients needed to rearrange the visit, and none patient underwent surgery before the scheduled post-lockdown visit. The interval to post-lockdown visit compared to pre-lockdown visit increased in 37.7% of patients. The satisfaction survey (n = 185) revealed that 94.6% perceived it was effective. However, 44.4% of patients rather prefer on-site consultation for follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic was shown to be effective and efficient to care for IBD patients. In addition, telephone consultation is well accepted by patients in non-extended follow-up periods.

COVID-19 vaccination rate and willingness of an additional dose among inflammatory bowel disease patients receiving biologic therapy: Fearless and with desire.

Effective vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 are already available and offer a promising action to control the COVID-19 pandemic. IBD patients on biological agents accept the vaccine as well as an additional dose if recommended. BACKGROUND: Vaccination against COVID-19 prevents its severe forms and associated mortality and offers a promising action to control this pandemic. In September 2021, an additional dose of vaccine was approved in patients with immunosuppression including IBD patients on biologic agents. We evaluated the vaccination rate and additional dose willingness in this group of at risk patients. METHODS: A single-center, cross-sectional study was performed among IBD patients on biologic agents and eligible for an additional dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. IBD clinical characteristics and type of vaccine and date of administration were checked in medical records. Acceptance was evaluated after telephone or face-to-face surveys in IBD patients. RESULTS: Out of a total of 344 patients, 269 patients (46.1% male; mean age 47±16 years; Crohn's disease 73.6%) were included. Only 15 (5.6%) patients refused the COVID-19 vaccine mainly (40%) for conviction (COVID-19 pandemic denial). 33.3% would re-consider after discussing with their doctor and/or receiving information on the adverse effects of the vaccine. Previous to the additional dose, the COVID-19 vaccination was present in 94.4% of patients (n=254). Adverse effects occurred in 53.9% of the cases, mainly pain in the arm (40%). Up to 94.1% of the patients agreed to an additional dose and 79.4% had already received the additional dose at the final time of the assessment. CONCLUSIONS: IBD patients on biological agents accept the vaccine as well as an additional dose if recommended. Physicians in charge of IBD units should provide information and confidence in the use of the vaccine in these IBD patients.

Asynchronous electronic consultation between primary care and specialized care proved effective for continuum of care for viraemic hepatitis C patients.

INTRODUCTION: It has been proposed that primary care diagnose and treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, a care circuit between primary and specialized care based on electronic consultation (EC) can be just as efficient in the micro-elimination of HCV. It is proposed to study characteristics and predictive factors of continuity of care in a circuit between primary and specialized care. METHODS: From February/2018 to December/2019, all EC between primary and specialized care were evaluated and those due to HCV were identified. Variables for regression analysis and to identify predictors of completing the care cascade were recorded. RESULTS: From 8098 EC, 138 were performed by 89 (29%) general practitioners over 118 patients (median 50.8 years; 74.6% men) and were related to HCV (1.9%). Ninety-two patients (78%) were diagnosed>6 months ago, and 26.3% met criteria for late presentation. Overall, 105 patients required assessment by the hepatologist, 82% (n=86) presented for the appointment, of which 67.6% (n=71) were viraemic, 98.6% of known. Finally, 61.9% (n=65) started treatment. Late-presenting status was identified as an independent predictor to complete the care cascade (OR 1.93, CI 1.71-1.99, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Communication pathway between Primary and Specialized Care based on EC is effective in avoiding significant losses of viraemic patients. However, the referral rate is very low, high in late-stage diagnoses, heterogeneous, and low in new diagnoses. Therefore, early detection strategies for HCV infection in primary care are urgently needed.

Definition of a therapeutic range for predicting long-term infliximab response in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

INTRODUCTION: Monitoring plasma levels of Infliximab plays an important role in optimising treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of the following study has been to determine the predictive potential of monitoring infliximab plasma levels for sustained clinical response and evaluate its usefulness to improve treatment efficacy and symptom control, in patients with IBD. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study (2017-2019) included patients diagnosed with IBD treated with infliximab. Serum levels and the occurrence of drug-associated immunogenicity were analysed at Week 8 post-induction and 6, 12 and 24 months. Clinical parameters and inflammatory markers were recorded such as subjective global assessment (SGA), C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FC). Factors associated with early discontinuation and dose intensification of infliximab were determined. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis determined that IFX concentrations>7µg/mL at week 8, and at 6 months, are associated with inflammatory remission (p=0.046, 0.045). IFX>7µg/mL at 12 months predicted remission at 18 months of treatment (p=0.006). IFX values>3µg/mL at 12 months are associated with stable SGA at 18 months (p=0.001). Such values at 18 months are associated with stable SGA at 24 months (p=0.044). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The predictive potential of monitoring IFX plasma levels as a strategy to evaluate sustained long-term clinical response was confirmed. Our results highlight the importance of its introduction into routine clinical practice to enable early identification of non-responders, treatment optimisation, relapse prevention and improve long-term therapy maintenance.

Impact of Biologic Agents on the Immune Response Induced by the Additional Dose of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

The immusne response to the vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 is altered in patients with inflammatory bowel disease using biological agents, and so we should ensure effective immunization in these patients by prioritizing those receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in the indication of new doses or booster doses of the vaccine.

Apolipoprotein C3 Is Downregulated in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been associated with an abnormal lipid profile. Apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC3) is a key molecule of triglyceride metabolism that is known to be related to inflammation and cardiovascular disease. In this study, we aim to study whether ApoC3 serum levels differ between patients with IBD and controls and whether the hypothetical disturbance of ApoC3 can be explained by IBD characteristics. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study that included 405 individuals, 197 patients with IBD and 208 age-matched and sex-matched controls. ApoC3 and standard lipid profiles were assessed in patients and controls. A multivariable analysis was performed to analyze whether ApoC3 serum levels were altered in IBD and to study their relationship to IBD characteristics. RESULTS: After fully multivariable analysis including cardiovascular risk factors, use of statins, and changes in lipid profile caused by the disease itself, patients with IBD showed significant lower serum levels of ApoC3 (beta coef. -1.6 [95% confidence interval -2.5 to -0.7] mg/dL, P = 0.001). Despite this, inflammatory markers, disease phenotypes, or disease activity of IBD was not found to be responsible for this downregulation. DISCUSSION: Apolipoprotein C3 is downregulated in patients with IBD.

Adherence to subcutaneous biologic treatment for inflammatory bowel disease / Adherencia al tratamiento con biológicos por vía subcutánea en enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal

Background: Nonadherence to medication is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and can result in disease complications, therapy escalation, and the need for corticosteroids. The aim of this study was to assess the adherence to self-administered subcutaneous biologic medications prescribed for IBD and to identify the risk factors for nonadherence.Methods: A retrospective cohort study on IBD patients initiated on subcutaneous biologic therapy between January 2016 and July 2019 was performed. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for collection of demographic and IBD data. Medication possession ratios (mMPRs) during the first 12 months of treatment and at the end of the follow-up period (global, 42 months) were calculated. Nonadherence was defined as an mMPR of <90%. Multiple regression analysis was performed to assess the risk factors for nonadherence to therapy.Results: A total of 154 patients (84 male and 70 female; mean age at biologic treatment initiation, 36±14 years; Crohn's disease, n=118; ulcerative colitis, n=31; indeterminate colitis, n=5) were included; 121 received adalimumab (ADA) and 33 received ustekinumab (UST); 63% were naive to anti-TNF therapy, while 16.9% previously received more than two biologic treatments. Mean time from IBD diagnosis to subcutaneous biological agent use was 16±10 months. Mean duration of subcutaneous agent use was 17.6 (SD, 11.0) and 17.08 (SD, 6.8) months for ADA and UST, respectively. Global nonadherence (mMPR≤90%) rate was 6.6% for all patients receiving subcutaneous treatment, 6.3% for ADA, and 6.5% for UST. Nonadherence during the first 12 months of treatment (n=98) was 6.1% for all patients, 2.7% for ADA, and 16% for UST. In the multivariate analysis, UST use was independently associated with higher nonadherence only within the first 12 months (OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 1.1–39.5).(AU)

Antecedentes y objetivos: La falta de adherencia al tratamiento médico es muy frecuente en los pacientes con enfermad inflamatoria intestinal (EII), puede determinar el desarrollo de complicaciones, el uso de corticoides y la necesidad de escalar tratamientos en estos pacientes. Los objetivos de este estudio son analizar la adherencia al tratamiento biológico de administración subcutánea en pacientes con EII e identificar factores de riesgo para la no-adherencia al tratamiento.Métodos: Estudio unicéntrico retrospectivo de cohorte en pacientes con EII que recibieron tratamiento biológico subcutáneo (adalimumab y ustekinumab) entre enero de 2016 y julio de 2019. Se realizó revisión retrospectiva de la historia clínica para recoger datos demográficos y de la EII. Se calculó el ratio modificado de posesión de la medicación (mMPR) para los primeros 12 meses de tratamiento y para el final del seguimiento (global-42 meses). Se definió como no-adherencia (adherencia inadecuada) si el mMPR era <90%. Se realizó un análisis de regresión logística para evaluar los factores de riesgo asociados con la no-adhesión.Resultados: Se incluyeron 154 pacientes (84/70; edad media de inicio de tratamiento biológico 36±14 años; enfermedad de Crohn n=118, Colitis Ulcerosa n=31, Colitis Indeterminada n=5). De ellos, 121 (78,6%) recibieron adalimumab (ADA) y 33 (21,4%) ustekinumab (UST); 97/154 (63%) de los pacientes no recibieron tratamiento biológico previo y 26/154 (16,9%) recibieron >2 agentes biológicos antes del tratamiento subcutáneo. El tiempo medio entre el diagnóstico de EII y el uso del biológico subcutáneo fue de 16±10 meses. El tiempo medio de uso de tratamiento subcutáneo se prolongó durante 17,6±11,0 y 17,08±6,8 meses para ADA y UST, respectivamente. La tasa global de no-adherencia al tratamiento fue 6,5% (10/154 pacientes) y específicamente del 6,1% (8/121 pacientes) y del 6,6% (2/33 pacientes) para el uso de ADA y UST, respectivamente.(AU)

Differentially Deregulated MicroRNAs as Novel Biomarkers for Neoplastic Progression in Ulcerative Colitis.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a potentially life-threatening complication of long-standing ulcerative colitis (UC). MicroRNAs (miRNA) are epigenetic regulators that have been involved in the development of UC-associated CRC. However, their role as potential mucosal biomarkers of neoplastic progression has not been adequately studied. METHODS: In this study, we analyzed the expression of 96 preselected miRNAs in human formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue of 52 case biopsies (20 normal mucosa, 20 dysplasia, and 12 UC-associated CRCs) and 50 control biopsies (10 normal mucosa, 21 sporadic adenomas, and 19 sporadic CRCs) by using Custom TaqMan Array Cards. For validation of deregulated miRNAs, we performed individual quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in an independent cohort of 50 cases (13 normal mucosa, 25 dysplasia, and 12 UC-associated CRCs) and 46 controls (7 normal mucosa, 19 sporadic adenomas, and 20 sporadic CRCs). RESULTS: Sixty-four miRNAs were found to be differentially deregulated in the UC-associated CRC sequence. Eight of these miRNAs were chosen for further validation. We confirmed miR-31, -106a, and -135b to be significantly deregulated between normal mucosa and dysplasia, as well as across the UC-associated CRC sequence (all P < 0.01). Notably, these miRNAs also confirmed to have a significant differential expression compared with sporadic CRC (all P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: UC-associated and sporadic CRCs have distinct miRNA expression patterns, and some miRNAs indicate early neoplastic progression.

Mutational signature profiling classifies subtypes of clinically different mismatch-repair-deficient tumours with a differential immunogenic response potential.

BACKGROUND: Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is the hallmark of tumours from Lynch syndrome (LS), sporadic MLH1 hypermethylated and Lynch-like syndrome (LLS), but there is a lack of understanding of the variability in their mutational profiles based on clinical phenotypes. The aim of this study was to perform a molecular characterisation to identify novel features that can impact tumour behaviour and clinical management. METHODS: We tested 105 MMR-deficient colorectal cancer tumours (25 LS, 35 LLS and 45 sporadic) for global exome microsatellite instability, cancer mutational signatures, mutational spectrum and neoepitope load. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of tumours showed high contribution of MMR-deficient mutational signatures, high level of global exome microsatellite instability, loss of MLH1/PMS2 protein expression and included sporadic tumours. Thirty-one percent of tumours showed weaker features of MMR deficiency, 62% lost MSH2/MSH6 expression and included 60% of LS and 44% of LLS tumours. Remarkably, 9% of all tumours lacked global exome microsatellite instability. Lastly, HLA-B07:02 could be triggering the neoantigen presentation in tumours that show the strongest contribution of MMR-deficient tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Next-generation sequencing approaches allow for a granular molecular characterisation of MMR-deficient tumours, which can be essential to properly diagnose and treat patients with these tumours in the setting of personalised medicine.

Validation of screening criteria for spondyloarthritis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in routine clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is one of the most common extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Diagnostic delay must be avoided. AIMS: We assessed the validity of SpA screening criteria (any of the following characteristics: chronic low back pain with onset before 45 years of age; inflammatory lower back pain or alternating buttock pain; arthritis; heel enthesitis; dacylitis; HLA-B27 positivity; sacroiliitis on imaging). METHODS: This was a multicenter cross-sectional observational study in IBD patients aged ≥18 years. After evaluating the SpA screening criteria, the gastroenterologists referred the participants to the rheumatologists, who determined whether the patient fulfilled the screening criteria and carried out the necessary tests for SpA diagnosis. RESULTS: 35 (11.7%) out of 300 patients were diagnosed with SpA. The combination with the best balance between sensitivity and specificity (91.4% and 72.1%, respectively, when applied by the rheumatologists; 80% and 78.9%, when applied by the gastroenterologists) for SpA screening, was fulfillment of any of the following: chronic low back pain with onset before age 45 years, inflammatory low back pain or alternating buttock pain, arthritis, or dactylitis. CONCLUSION: This is one of the first studies to validate SpA screening criteria in IBD patients in routine clinical practice.

Adherence to subcutaneous biologic treatment for inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to medication is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and can result in disease complications, therapy escalation, and the need for corticosteroids. The aim of this study was to assess the adherence to self-administered subcutaneous biologic medications prescribed for IBD and to identify the risk factors for nonadherence. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study on IBD patients initiated on subcutaneous biologic therapy between January 2016 and July 2019 was performed. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for collection of demographic and IBD data. Medication possession ratios (mMPRs) during the first 12 months of treatment and at the end of the follow-up period (global, 42 months) were calculated. Nonadherence was defined as an mMPR of <90%. Multiple regression analysis was performed to assess the risk factors for nonadherence to therapy. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients (84 male and 70 female; mean age at biologic treatment initiation, 36±14 years; Crohn's disease, n=118; ulcerative colitis, n=31; indeterminate colitis, n=5) were included; 121 received adalimumab (ADA) and 33 received ustekinumab (UST); 63% were naive to anti-TNF therapy, while 16.9% previously received more than two biologic treatments. Mean time from IBD diagnosis to subcutaneous biological agent use was 16±10 months. Mean duration of subcutaneous agent use was 17.6 (SD, 11.0) and 17.08 (SD, 6.8) months for ADA and UST, respectively. Global nonadherence (mMPR≤90%) rate was 6.6% for all patients receiving subcutaneous treatment, 6.3% for ADA, and 6.5% for UST. Nonadherence during the first 12 months of treatment (n=98) was 6.1% for all patients, 2.7% for ADA, and 16% for UST. In the multivariate analysis, UST use was independently associated with higher nonadherence only within the first 12 months (OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 1.1-39.5). CONCLUSIONS: High global adherence to self-administered subcutaneous biologic treatment was shown in our study, with higher rates of adherence to ADA than to UST within the first 12 months.

Quality of Colonoscopy Is Associated With Adenoma Detection and Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Lynch Syndrome.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality in Lynch syndrome (LS) carriers. However, a high incidence of postcolonoscopy CRC (PCCRC) has been reported. Colonoscopy is highly dependent on endoscopist skill and is subject to quality variability. We aimed to evaluate the impact of key colonoscopy quality indicators on adenoma detection and prevention of PCCRC in LS. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter study focused on LS carriers without previous CRC undergoing colonoscopy surveillance (n = 893). Incident colorectal neoplasia during surveillance and quality indicators of all colonoscopies were analyzed. We performed an emulated target trial comparing the results from the first and second surveillance colonoscopies to assess the effect of colonoscopy quality indicators on adenoma detection and PCCRC incidence. Risk analyses were conducted using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: The 10-year cumulative incidence of adenoma and PCCRC was 60.6% (95% CI, 55.5%-65.2%) and 7.9% (95% CI, 5.2%-10.6%), respectively. Adequate bowel preparation (odds ratio [OR], 2.07; 95% CI, 1.06-4.3), complete colonoscopies (20% vs 0%; P = .01), and pan-chromoendoscopy use (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.15-3.95) were associated with significant improvement in adenoma detection. PCCRC risk was significantly lower when colonoscopies were performed during a time interval of less than every 3 years (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14-0.97). We observed a consistent but not significant reduction in PCCRC risk for a previous complete examination (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-1.28), adequate bowel preparation (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.17-3.24), or previous use of high-definition colonoscopy (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.02-2.33). CONCLUSIONS: Complete colonoscopies with adequate bowel preparation and chromoendoscopy use are associated with improved adenoma detection, while surveillance intervals of less than 3 years are associated with a reduction of PCCRC incidence. In LS, high-quality colonoscopy surveillance is of utmost importance for CRC prevention.

Re-induction With Intravenous Ustekinumab in Patients With Crohn's Disease and a Loss of Response to This Therapy.

BACKGROUND: A significant percentage of patients treated with ustekinumab may lose response. Our aim was to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of intravenous re-induction with ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease who have lost the response to the treatment. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational, multicenter study. Treatment efficacy was measured at week 8 and 16; clinical remission was defined when the Harvey-Bradshaw Index was ≤4 points, and clinical response was defined as a decrease of ≥3 points in the index compared with the baseline. Adverse events and treatment decisions after re-induction were also collected. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients from 13 centers were included. Forty-nine percent had previously failed to respond to 2 biological treatments, and 24.5% had failed to respond to 3. The average exposure time to ustekinumab before re-induction was 17.7 ± 12.8 months. In 56.6% of patients, the administration interval had been shortened to every 4 to 6 weeks before re-induction. At week 8 and 16 after re-induction, 49.0% (n = 26) and 43.3% (n = 23), respectively, were in remission, whereas 64.1% (n = 34) and 52.8% (n = 28) had a clinical response. Patients who achieved remission at week 16 had lower C-reactive protein levels than those who did not respond (2.8 ± 1.6 vs 12.5 ± 9.5 mg/dL; P = 0.001). No serious adverse events related to re-induction were observed. CONCLUSION: Intravenous re-induction with ustekinumab is an effective and safe strategy that recovers the response in approximately half of the patients with refractory Crohn's disease who experience a loss of response. Re-induction can be attempted before switching out of the therapy class.